What is your Philosophy of Arranging?
Does " Philosophy of Arranging" sound pretentious? Maybe I should just say "Guidelines"or "My Style" or "Things That Work and Things That Don't"
Good arrangements have lots of contrast. Contrast in dynamics, tone color, instrumentation, and texture. Short drum breaks in the middle of songs. Solos. Small ensembles. Woodwind features.
To create contrast, you need thinner textures. Many stock arrangements have everybody playing all the time. Contrast doesn't mean Full band at F, then MF, then FF. That's boring. You need Full Band at PP, then just woodwinds, then sixteen bars of mallets. When the full band comes back in at FF, that's effective!
Solos are Good. Most bands don't have nearly enough solo and small ensemble sections. IMHO one third of a show should be solos or small ensembles.
Solos and small ensembles are are the best sound your band can make..
Duets, small ensembles, and percussion breaks are just as good as solos.
Solos create contrast, they grab audience attention, and they let everyone else rest.
Solos keep your best players interested and motivated.
Your music should reflect the different ability levels in your band. Are your section leaders sitting around bored while you spend 3/4 of your time with your weakest players?
The answer, of course, is to to fit the parts to the players. Give your best players flashy or beautifully melodic solos and interesting ensembles (didn't you read the top part of this page?)
Give your younger players a part they can MASTER.